Charles Edward Anderson Berry aka Chuck Berry was born in St. Louis,Missouri on Oct. 18,1926. I heard the news of his death  which happened yesterday  in St. Louis as well. He was 90 years old.

Having read all the articles regarding him, I will give my own input as well about this man who’s considered the Father of Rock and Roll, an original Rock and Roll legend, in fact, was the first inductee to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

His musical repertoire reflected his views on happiness and rebellion.He was able to use his great songwriting skills to tell stories that happen in  society —- for example—“Sweet Little Sixteen”(about young female fans called groupies), “School Day“(about daily school routines and trials and tribulations),”Back in the U.S.“(black man’s tribute to his country–the USA) ,”Johnny  B. Goode“(aspiring country guitar player being encouraged by his mom to pursue his dream to be a star).

The Johnny B. Goode song  became an anthem for every aspiring musician who dreams to hit the big time. It was also Chuck Berry’s signature song.

The song”Rock and Roll Music” became the guide song for all future rock bands to follow.

Even his gifted guitar skills have inspired known rock guitarists like George Harrison,Keith Richards and Eric Clapton for example.

He was able to combine both country fast beat and rhythm in blues song to produce the rock and roll music beat that we know now.

He was also an amazing live performer and would use his”bent-leg duck” walk from time to time while playing his guitar. on stage.

He was also known for his brushes with the law as well as his many extramarital liaisons  yet he was able only to serve just part of his time in jail and the rest were either dismissed ,commuted or pardoned. He remained married to his wife Themetta Suggs who stayed by his side up to his death.

His fame had been stratospheric and one example would be the launching of the unmanned Voyager in 1977 by NASA and inside that rocket was stored a music album containing a musical playlist which included  only 1 rock song—Johnny B. Goode. The purpose of that musical album was to explain to any potential extraterrestials that the Voyager may encounter as to what kind of music is being played on the planet Earth.

On his 90th birthday last year, he announced that he would be releasing his musical album first new in 38 years on 2017,titled “Chuck”. This would be a compilation of his new,original songs which were written,recorded and produced by him.

He reflected that he may be nearing the end of his life ,thus the end of his musical career and felt that it’ll be the time to hang up his boots.

It should be pointed out that he never stopped performing even when he got on in years. It probably kept him feeling young and strong because music playing and songwriting was what kept him busy and which he loved doing so.

He may be gone now but his music will live on. For me personally, all I need to do is just go on Youtube and watch Michael J. Fox sing Johnny B. Goode on 1 Back to the Future clip. I could even shake a leg and hip to its catchy beat too!









News item  from Chris Morris–Legislature Bureau—Nov. 12, 2016

Boys  killed in snake attack would have fought hard  : grandmother

The death of 2 little boys in a horrific snake attack was the focus of a now-finished trial in Campbellton, but for relatives of the children, it is their lives they remember,helping the family carry on despite the devastating loss.

The Barthe brothers Connor,6,and Noah,4, were very close,accdg. to their grandmother,Linda Barthe, who attended every day of the 8-day criminal negligence trial in Campbellton.

On Thursday,Jean-Claude Savoie, the owner of the almost 4-meter long python that killed the children, was found not guilty by a jury of criminal negligence causing their deaths in the 2013 tragedy.

Linda Barthe said it was difficult to sit through the trial,which included details about the attack on the children after the snake escaped its enclosure in Savoie’s apartmetn and killed the boys while they were on a sleep over.

“We had to be there for the boys,”Barthe said,who showed up everyday  with her husband and the boys’ grandfather,Ernest.

“I said to myself,”The boys went through it. I can go through it.”

She said Noah,who kept everyone in the family laughing with his funny comments called “Noah-isms”,was excited to start kindergarten. Connor,serious and thoughtful and about to start Grade 2, was intensely protective of his little brother and often put his arm around the smaller chiled.

Barthe said she was told that Noah died first in teh snake attack- a detail that did not come out at trial. She said the family believes whoever  was attacked first, the brothers would not leave each other.

“No matter which one was attacked first, there is no question that the other would definitely have gone to help,’Barthe said in an interview with Brunswick News.

“There would have been no hesitation. I don’t remember who told me, but I was told that Noah died first. Connor would have been right in there, fighting tooth and nail. We know he would have tried to help.”

The battle against the snake would have been uneven. The African rock python that killed the children was known to be aggressive and bad-tempered and if one child had tried to free the other, a snake expert who testified at the trial said the reptile was long enough to wrap both boys in its deadly coils and constrict.

A pathologist said the brothers died of asphyxiation.

Barthe said she often looked after the children,occasionally picking them up at their daycare and bringing them to her home in Dalhousie.

She said she always smiles when she recalls the routine the boys had when they came to her home, including asking their granddad to make pancakes-their favorite meal when visiting.

“I would sit for hours watching them play in the yard,”she said.

“there was no fighting.They were just precious,precious,precious,beautiful boys. They had big,dark eyes. Connor was such a handsome little boy and Noah was very cute. They were happy children. They were loved and they knew they were loved. I think that makes a huge difference in the life of a child-to know they are loved.”

Barthe said the family still is in pain over the loss. She said there has been counselling for some family members.Others still cannot talk about it and others just carry on as best they can.

She said there is an ache that will never go away.

“It is difficult to explain the hurt,the physical and mental hurt,when you hear something like this,”Barthe said.

‘The pain is physical. My husband said when I was told they were gone, I screamed so loud i must have woken up everyone in the neighborhood.”

Barthe said that when it comes to Savoie and the trial,there has never been any doubt in her mind that he loved the boys. She said their deaths will be a burden for him for the rest of his life, a fact acknowledged by Savoie through his defense lawyers.

“I don’t know what he will think when he closes his eyes and remembers Connor and Noah,”she said. “But i know when I close my eyes, and see them playing in my yard once again, I smile.”


After reading this article, my thoughts and prayers for all those involved.








Excerpts from Chris Morris–Legislature Bureau—Nov. 9, 2016

Jean-Claude Savoie found not guilty in case of young brothers being killed by python

CAMPBELLTON- Jean-Claude Savoie,whose large and aggressive African rock python killed 2 little boys on Aug. 5, 2013 .has been found not guilty of criminal negligence causing death. The 11-member jury delivered its verdict on Wednesday after deliberations for 5 hours.

Savoie’s immediate reaction was tears as he cried with family members.

The verdict follows an 8-day trial during which the jury heard often disturbing testimony about terrifying attack on 2 small boys by what was described as a “mean” and “crazy” python.

The deaths of the children in such a bizarre and horrific manner created headlines around the world when it happened in 2013, and it remains a sensitive issue in this northern New Brunswick community.




Excerpts from Chris Morris—Legislature Bureau—Nov. 9, 2016

Jury begins deliberations in python trial

Campbellton- The jury has begun deliberations in the criminal negligence trial arising from the deaths of 2 little boys who were killed by what was described as a “mean” python that escaped its enclosure.

After a week of testimony at a courthouse in Campbellton,Jean-Claude Savoie should know soon whether he has been found guilty or not guilty of criminal negligence causing the deaths of brothers Connor Barthe,6 and Noah Barthe,4 on Aug. 5, 2013.

Justice Fred Ferguson,the presiding judge at the Court of Queen’s Bench trial,described the complexities of the law surrounding the charge of criminal negligence causing death in his final instructions to the jury on Wednesday morning.

He made it clear to jurors that to find Savoie guilty,they must agree that his conduct showed “a marked and substantial departure from what a reasonably prudent person would do in the same circumstances.”

Ferguson also stressed the importance of “reasonable doubt” telling jurors that while there cannot be absolute certainty,it is not enough for them to decide Savoie is probably guilty.

The judge also is providing a review of the evidence in the tragic case in which the 2 boys were killed by an aggressive African rock python that crawled out of its pen in Savoie’s apartment through a ceiling air vent. The snake then fell through the ceiling above where the boys were sleeping on  a mattress on the living room floor.

The almost 4 meter long snake used its coils to constrict the children,asphyxiating them.






Excerpts from Chris MorrisLegislature Bureau—Nov. 9, 2016

CAMPBELLTON- Just a couple of screws in  a vent cover could have saved 2 little boys who were killed by an escaped snake, a jury was told as the prosecution argued for a guilty verdict in the criminal negligence trial arising from their tragic deaths.

Crown prosecutor Pierre Roussel and defense lawyer Les Matchim concluded their summations on Tuesday and the case is expected to go to the jury on Wednesday following Justice Fred Ferguson’s instructions.

“It wouldn’t have taken a lot of work,”Roussel aid,holding the vent cover at the trial of Jean-Claude Savoie.

“He just had to screw it in.”

Savoie is charged with criminal negligence causing the deaths of brothers Connor,6,and Noah Barthe,.4,.on Aug. 5,2013,when an African rock python escaped its pen in Savoie’s apartment by crawling through an open air duct in its enclosure.

Witnesses have told  the trial the cover to the ceiling duct often was on the floor of the snake’s pen. The vent cover had 4 small holes where it could be secured in place with screws,but it wasn’t.

“It was a dangerous place to live in that apartment ,”Roussel said,adding that Savoie did not take appropriate steps to ensure the safety of people visiting his home,especially the Barthe brothers.

Savoie wiped away tears as his lawyer,Les Matchim, urged the jury to find his client not guilty. Matchim said Savoie is a “good father” to his own little boy and he cared deeply about the 2 brothers who died in the snake attack in his apartment.

“He is not someone who would be reckless and cavalier with their lives,”the defense lawyer said.

Matchim said Savoie made a grave mistake,one he must live with”for the rest of his life.”

But Matchim insisted that Savoie never showed the kind of wanton recklessness and disregard for safety that characterize criminal negligence.

“Would he put hi sown safety ad that of his son at risk”Matchim asked.

Savoie’s 3 year old son was in a separate room during the 2013 snake attack and was not hurt.

Referring to key testimony that Savoie  had once seen the python “halfway out” of the ventilation pipe but failed to take corrective action,Matchim said the incident served as proof to Savoie that the 4 meter snake could not fit completely through the pipe.

Matchim said Savoie performed a “service” to the federal government by taking in the snake,but he was never compensated for caring for the animal.


More updates to follow once available.



Excerpt from a news article by Chris  MorrisLegislature Bureau–Nov. 8,2016

Snake expert testifies in ongoing trial

CAMPBELLTON- A snake expert testifying for the defense at the Campbellton python trial says there’s “no way in hell” he would have thought a large African rock python could have squeezed through the ventilation pipe it used to escape and kill two little boys.

Eugene Bessette, a snake farmer in Archer,Florida,was the only witness for the defense on Monday which means Jean-Claude Savoie ,the man accused of criminal negligence causing the deaths of brothers Connor and Noah Barthe,will not be testifying.

Bessette will return to the stand on Tuesday for possible cross-examination by Crown prosecutor Pierre Roussel . That will be the end of testimony since both the Crown and the defense will have called all of their witnesses.

The jury likely will begin deliberations on Wednesday,following closing arguments and the charge by trial judge,Justice Fred Ferguson.

The defense and the prosecution presented dueling snake experts on Monday,with Bessette supporting the defense position that Savoie  did not bother fixing an open ventilation duct in the python ‘s enclosure because he assumed,like others,the snake would not fit through the hole and the pipe.

“Based on what I know,I would have assumed there is no way in hell that snake could have got through that pipe,”Bessette told the jury.

“I wouldn’t have been worried.But I would have been wrong.”

Bessette said he was “shocked and astounded’ when he looked at photos of the evidence,including the roughly four-inch wide ventilation pipe and the snake,which measured 4.25 inches in diameter at its widest point,with a head that was 2.5 inches wide.

“I am amazed a snake that big got through that hole,but it did.”said Bessette who raises and sells thousands of pythons and other snakes at his Florida operation.

“That was a big snake. that was a small hole.”

Savoie’s lawyer,Les Matchim,presented the defense theory to the jury on Monday,focusing on the issue of predictability in the criminal negligence case. Matchim

said the negligence accusation boils down to whether Savoie’s failure to cover the open ventilation duct in the snake’s enclosure constitutes criminal negligence.

“Mr. Savoie came to the determination that the snake could never escape. It just didn’t fit through the pipe.”he sid.

“Mr.Savoie was wrong ,but according to the law, being wrong isn’t necessarily criminal negligence.”


Court resumes on Wed., Nov. 9.2016.







From a news article by Chris Morris–Legislature Bureau– Nov. 5,2016

Snake trial will proceed,but with 11 jurors

CAMPBELLTON- After a long delay, the criminal negligence trial arising from the deaths of two boys in a snake attack resumed on Friday,but with 11 jurors instead of 12.

Justice Fred Ferguson told the court that one of the jurors was “relieved of her duties” and discharged with the agreement of both prosecution and defence lawyers.

Ferguson told the remaining jurors that despite losing a day of evidence on Friday,he is confident the case will conclude on Wednesday after closing arguments by lawyers and his own charge to the jury.

It then will be up to the jurors to decide whether Jean-Claude Savoie is guilty or not guilty of criminal negligence in the deaths of brothers,Connor,6,and Noah Barthe,4,who were killed by a python on Aug. 5,2013.

Crown prosecutors and the defence agreed to two admissions of fact on Friday,admissions that will allow the trial to move ahead with fewer witnesses.

The first,key admission is agreement on both sides that the African rock python did escape from its enclosure in Savoie’s apartment”through a ventilation pipe”in the ceiling of the pen.

The agreement says the snake then got access to the living room of the apartment where the little boys were sleeping on a  mattress on the floor”attacked both and caused their deaths by asphyxiation.”

This admission means Crown prosecutor Pierre Roussel does not have to prove the snake travelled through the air duct,which,according to witnesses,often was open and exposed because of a loose cover.

The defence is conceding that is how the snake escaped and killed the brothers.

In the second statement read in court.both sides agree that in 2002, the Canadian Wildfire Service took into its custody a juvenile African rock python which they subsequently asked Savoie to care for in Campbellton. “At that time,destroying a seized animal was a last resort ,”the statement says.

The wildlife service said there was no funding given to Savoie for care and maintenance of the snake,identified as the one that killed the boys.

Roussel was supposed to conclude his case on Friday but the judge decided to give everyone a break and ended proceedings at lunch.

Roussel now is expected to call his last witness on Monday. The witness,Bob Johnson,former curator of reptiles and amphibians at the Toronto Zoo,is an expert in snake behaviour.

During the week,Roussel presented the Crown’s theory of what happened on Aug. 5,2013,when an African rock python escaped its enclosures in Savoie’s second floor apartment located on Pleasant Street in Campbellton.

The apartment was located above Savoie’s now-closed exotic pet business,called Reptile Ocean.

Savoie kept the snake,and a crocodile,in separate enclosures in the living quarters of the building.

It meant the python was just a few metres away from where brothers Connor,6, and four-year-old Noah Barthe  were sleeping on the living room floor.

Pathologist Dr. Marek Godlewski told the court the boys’ bodies were covered with many puncture wounds that matched the tooth pattern of the python,which is non-venomous but bites prey when constrictng.

“The pattern on the wounds was consistent with the pattern of the teeth.”Godlewski told the jury.

He said the boys had been asphyxiated and squeezed so tight,the skin of one of the boys got a “lace-like” pattern from the snake. there also were scaly bits of snake skin found on one of the boys.

Savoie has been charged with criminal negligence causing the deaths of the boys. He has pleaded not guilty.

Once the Crown concludes its case, the defence will begin its arguments.



Court resumes on Monday—Nove. 7,2016